tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37179942.post3381564706021030543..comments2023-10-22T05:51:58.898-04:00Comments on Soob: NATO is WobblingJay@Soobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12208597218366281778noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37179942.post-1762680815256986242008-02-04T20:43:00.000-05:002008-02-04T20:43:00.000-05:00Heh. Daalder and Goldgier's article is understanda...Heh. Daalder and Goldgier's article is understandably optimistic. Maybe GTO? Nah, that's a bit too Pontiac. GISN (Global Initiative for Sustainable Nations?) Maybe an open thread?Jay@Soobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12208597218366281778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37179942.post-46404464162074703072008-02-02T22:07:00.000-05:002008-02-02T22:07:00.000-05:00Perhaps we would call it "Global NATO"?Perhaps we would call it "<A HREF="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060901faessay85509/ivo-daalder-james-goldgeier/global-nato.html" REL="nofollow">Global NATO</A>"?Adrianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05953649845499754508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37179942.post-3471113670935949542008-02-02T20:36:00.000-05:002008-02-02T20:36:00.000-05:00I'll second your expansion and suggest that NATO e...I'll second your expansion and suggest that NATO evolve to a more appropriate treaty. The Cold War, as we knew it, is over. I'd add Japan, Israel and maybe South Korea as well. What would we call this new treaty?Jay@Soobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12208597218366281778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37179942.post-89588414448521754822008-02-02T16:31:00.000-05:002008-02-02T16:31:00.000-05:00NATO irrelevant?Why is the North Atlantic Treaty O...NATO irrelevant?<BR/><BR/>Why is the <B>North Atlantic</B> Treaty Organization fighting a counterinsurgency in central Asia?<BR/><BR/>I think NATO needs to expand to stay relevant - bring in the Aussies and New Zealanders, and make it a global force.Adrianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05953649845499754508noreply@blogger.com